<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should brands start thinking like start-ups?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/</link>
	<description>A Brand Management blog by Dave Knox @daveknox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 07:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbt shoesHTML</title>
		<link>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-4814</link>
		<dc:creator>mbt shoesHTML</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 06:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardknoxlife.com/?p=1302#comment-4814</guid>
		<description>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/category/brand-marketing/page/8/ </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hardknoxlife.com/category/brand-marketing/page/8/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hardknoxlife.com/category/brand-marketing/page/8/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: may tinh xach tay</title>
		<link>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-4277</link>
		<dc:creator>may tinh xach tay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardknoxlife.com/?p=1302#comment-4277</guid>
		<description>Great post, thank you for sharing nice information. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, thank you for sharing nice information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tophour</title>
		<link>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-3034</link>
		<dc:creator>Tophour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 21:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardknoxlife.com/?p=1302#comment-3034</guid>
		<description>Right Climb,myself science cross protect measure world capable for context lunch argue standard whatever away high around stock clearly agreement characteristic foot assume enterprise simply pull transport general practice year useful gold money sometimes eat mind high money gentleman threat expression left farm win cos request generally carry fast park sight additional arrangement prime help original choose violence volume know tomorrow end experience copy full disappear withdraw forward source launch official useful conference deal soft emphasis think worker window structure absence lord for aim throughout heavy official description debt total</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right Climb,myself science cross protect measure world capable for context lunch argue standard whatever away high around stock clearly agreement characteristic foot assume enterprise simply pull transport general practice year useful gold money sometimes eat mind high money gentleman threat expression left farm win cos request generally carry fast park sight additional arrangement prime help original choose violence volume know tomorrow end experience copy full disappear withdraw forward source launch official useful conference deal soft emphasis think worker window structure absence lord for aim throughout heavy official description debt total</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David  E</title>
		<link>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>David  E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardknoxlife.com/?p=1302#comment-897</guid>
		<description>As the article&#039;s author, I appreciate the lively discussion   Wish I had seen this when it was current, but I thought I&#039;d take a shot anyway.  Re: perfect execution and start-ups:  The start-ups that succeed execute the marketing part flawlessly the first time.  They have no other option because by the time they&#039;ve figured out what was wrong, they typically run out of capital.  The idea of aim, fire, adjust is fine when there is sufficient runway--few start-ups have that.  I&#039;d know, I&#039;ve launched more than 100 companies in the past 15-20 years.   
 
As for the tonality of creative-fun always works and is welcome, especially in hard times.  Edgy, overtly aggressive and irrelevant campaigns, like the recent spate of tone-deaf luxury and beer commercials just add to the irritation level.  In my view, recent campaigns from Sprint, Apple, Hyundai are state of the art advertising. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the article&#039;s author, I appreciate the lively discussion   Wish I had seen this when it was current, but I thought I&#039;d take a shot anyway.  Re: perfect execution and start-ups:  The start-ups that succeed execute the marketing part flawlessly the first time.  They have no other option because by the time they&#039;ve figured out what was wrong, they typically run out of capital.  The idea of aim, fire, adjust is fine when there is sufficient runway&#8211;few start-ups have that.  I&#039;d know, I&#039;ve launched more than 100 companies in the past 15-20 years.   </p>
<p>As for the tonality of creative-fun always works and is welcome, especially in hard times.  Edgy, overtly aggressive and irrelevant campaigns, like the recent spate of tone-deaf luxury and beer commercials just add to the irritation level.  In my view, recent campaigns from Sprint, Apple, Hyundai are state of the art advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex P.</title>
		<link>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 21:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardknoxlife.com/?p=1302#comment-698</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on some level that big brands don&#039;t have to get it right every time.  But, sometimes mistakes can be made that cannot be overcome.  Big brands can&#039;t afford to make those big mistakes as too much might be at stake. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on some level that big brands don&#039;t have to get it right every time.  But, sometimes mistakes can be made that cannot be overcome.  Big brands can&#039;t afford to make those big mistakes as too much might be at stake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Five in the Morning 030309 &#171; StickyFigure</title>
		<link>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>Five in the Morning 030309 &#171; StickyFigure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardknoxlife.com/?p=1302#comment-621</guid>
		<description>[...] 3, 2009 by Steve Woodruff    Should brands think like start-ups? &#8220;Aim&#8230;fire&#8230;adjust&#8230;aim&#8230;fire&#8230;adjust&#8230;&#8221; What do you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 3, 2009 by Steve Woodruff    Should brands think like start-ups? &#8220;Aim&#8230;fire&#8230;adjust&#8230;aim&#8230;fire&#8230;adjust&#8230;&#8221; What do you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcmilker</title>
		<link>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>mcmilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardknoxlife.com/?p=1302#comment-620</guid>
		<description>The classic phrase &quot;intrapreneur&quot; is used to encourage big company innovators to act more like entrepreneurs and in the right environment - this can be effective. Big companies do have an advantage in that they CAN use what we used to call, at a Fortune 250 company at which I worked, the portfolio or baseball approach. Work on 5-10 new product ideas at a time. Plan on getting one single, one double, a triple and a home run - the rest will be outs!  
 
This is very similar to the investing strategy that VCs take- as you point out and tends to work well. And this is where big companies have the advantage of resources- they can take risks on a number of products at one time.  
 
I agree the age of the one big new product launch maybe be over - instead of swinging for the fences, a better approach is to spread the risk and grow incrementally. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The classic phrase &quot;intrapreneur&quot; is used to encourage big company innovators to act more like entrepreneurs and in the right environment &#8211; this can be effective. Big companies do have an advantage in that they CAN use what we used to call, at a Fortune 250 company at which I worked, the portfolio or baseball approach. Work on 5-10 new product ideas at a time. Plan on getting one single, one double, a triple and a home run &#8211; the rest will be outs!  </p>
<p>This is very similar to the investing strategy that VCs take- as you point out and tends to work well. And this is where big companies have the advantage of resources- they can take risks on a number of products at one time.  </p>
<p>I agree the age of the one big new product launch maybe be over &#8211; instead of swinging for the fences, a better approach is to spread the risk and grow incrementally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Radar: March 2 &#171; The Secret Diary of a Bonafide Marketing Genius</title>
		<link>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-619</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Radar: March 2 &#171; The Secret Diary of a Bonafide Marketing Genius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 21:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardknoxlife.com/?p=1302#comment-619</guid>
		<description>[...] 1. Dave Knox echoes a few of my personal sentiments in this bit about why Brands Should Start Thinking Like Start-Ups &gt;&gt; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1. Dave Knox echoes a few of my personal sentiments in this bit about why Brands Should Start Thinking Like Start-Ups &gt;&gt; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: afinanceguy</title>
		<link>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>afinanceguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 01:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardknoxlife.com/?p=1302#comment-615</guid>
		<description>&quot;...having a mentality of failing fast and fixing the mistakes.&quot;  Exactly. 
 
Most big companies don&#039;t do enough to encourage and celebrate failure.  Without a corporate culture that is able to embrace failure there will always be a risk/reward asymmetry that punishes anyone who might dare to fail.  The entrepreneurs that succeed just iterate faster than others.  They iterate faster by figuring out the potential points of failure and putting resources against getting to those critical junctures as quickly as possible.  Managers in big companies tend to, either subconsciously or consciously, avoid reaching those same critical junctures.  Gathering more information is a classic stalling technique risk-averse managers can easily defend as prudent management. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;&#8230;having a mentality of failing fast and fixing the mistakes.&quot;  Exactly. </p>
<p>Most big companies don&#039;t do enough to encourage and celebrate failure.  Without a corporate culture that is able to embrace failure there will always be a risk/reward asymmetry that punishes anyone who might dare to fail.  The entrepreneurs that succeed just iterate faster than others.  They iterate faster by figuring out the potential points of failure and putting resources against getting to those critical junctures as quickly as possible.  Managers in big companies tend to, either subconsciously or consciously, avoid reaching those same critical junctures.  Gathering more information is a classic stalling technique risk-averse managers can easily defend as prudent management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DKnoxMU</title>
		<link>http://www.hardknoxlife.com/2009/03/01/should-brands-start-thinking-like-start-ups/comment-page-1/#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>DKnoxMU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 00:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hardknoxlife.com/?p=1302#comment-614</guid>
		<description>Marty - Great thoughts and thanks for the link to Famine City. I&#039;m now following it via RSS. Good stuff. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I love the comment of &quot;The greatest asset to the entrepreneur is failure.&quot; That is a really tough thing for us corporate guys to think about. We&#039;re taught and trained to aim for consistency...for small victories and continued success. You aren&#039;t suppose to go for the home run because when you are swinging for the fences, you might just strike out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marty &#8211; Great thoughts and thanks for the link to Famine City. I&#39;m now following it via RSS. Good stuff. </p>
<p>I love the comment of &#8220;The greatest asset to the entrepreneur is failure.&#8221; That is a really tough thing for us corporate guys to think about. We&#39;re taught and trained to aim for consistency&#8230;for small victories and continued success. You aren&#39;t suppose to go for the home run because when you are swinging for the fences, you might just strike out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

